Skip to content
Interior of a steel and glass pedestrian bridge showing the structural framing.

CEGR 492 · Chapter 2 — Literature Review

Overview

Structural framing of a pedestrian bridge: members, connections and the load path a designer must trace.

Phase III · Literature Review

Literature Review Overview

Track every stage of a defensible literature review — from search strategy to a peer- and advisor-reviewed Chapter 2 — and know exactly which activity to do next.

Total sources

8

Peer-reviewed

6

Agency / government

2

Standards

0

Reviewed

0

Pending review

8

Themes

0

Citation completeness

0%

Chapter 2 progress

0%

Gap support

0%

Advisor approved

0

Needs verification

8

Eleven-stage literature workflow

  1. 1. Research Problem

    0 of 1 tracked tasks complete

  2. 2. Search Keywords

    0 of 6 tracked tasks complete

  3. 3. Database Search

    0 of 4 tracked tasks complete

  4. 4. Source Screening
    0%
    Target: 25 sources
    Continue

    0 of 5 tracked tasks complete

  5. 5. Source Evaluation
    0%
    Target: 15 sources
    Continue

    0 of 15 tracked tasks complete

  6. 6. Technical Reading
    0%
    Target: 12 sources
    Continue

    0 of 12 tracked tasks complete

  7. 7. Annotation
    0%
    Target: 12 sources
    Continue

    0 of 12 tracked tasks complete

  8. 8. Synthesis Matrix
    0%
    Target: 12 sources
    Continue

    0 of 4 tracked tasks complete

  9. 9. Theme Development
    0%
    Target: 12 sources
    Continue

    0 of 4 tracked tasks complete

  10. 10. Gap Validation
    0%
    Target: 10 sources
    Continue

    0 of 3 tracked tasks complete

  11. 11. Chapter 2 Draft
    0%
    Target: 20 sources
    Continue

    0 of 10 tracked tasks complete

Recommended next step

Research Problem

Continue the literature workflow.

Continue

Recommendations

  • Collect at least 17 more sources to reach a defensible literature base.
  • Add more peer-reviewed studies — technical claims need reviewed evidence, not agency summaries alone.
  • 8 sources have not been evaluated for credibility.
  • Add a current design standard to support the proposed methodology.
  • Review conflicting findings related to foundation settlement before drafting that theme.
© 2026 Civil Engineering Capstone Studio. All rights reserved.