Skip to content

Lake Classification

Hydrology and Water Resources · FE Reference Handbook section

Hydrology and Water Resources
0 formulas
10 exam-style examples
~45 min
All Hydrology and Water Resources lectures

Learning objectives

What you must be able to do before leaving this section.

This chapter section covers Lake Classification within Hydrology and Water Resources. Read it the way you would read a textbook chapter: the theory first so the relations mean something, then every equation with its use and its trap, then 10 fully worked examples with the arithmetic shown line by line, and finally a self-check you should be able to answer without notes.

  • Explain, in your own words, what lake classification describes physically and when it applies.
  • State every one of the 0 relations the handbook lists here and name each symbol with its unit.
  • Select the correct relation from the wording of an exam stem within 20 seconds.
  • Carry a complete solution from givens to a "most nearly" answer with the correct unit.
  • Recognise the distractors generated by the unit trap: acre-in/hr ≈ cfs makes the rational formula work in US units.

Lecture

Why this section exists. Lake Classification is the part of Hydrology and Water Resources that lets you connect a watershed, aquifer or detention facility to a number you can defend. Before any equation is useful you must be able to picture the physical situation it describes; the schematic below is that picture.

How the theory is built. The handbook prints results, not derivations. Each relation in this section comes from one governing principle applied to the idealised system: state the principle, impose the stated assumptions, and the printed equation follows. Knowing which assumption each relation rests on is what lets you reject a wrong answer choice in seconds.

How it is examined. Items from this page are written as a rainfall-runoff or well-drawdown calculation with one lookup. Roughly two thirds are direct substitution, one third require one intermediate quantity from a neighbouring relation, and a small number are conceptual — testing whether you know the assumption, not the arithmetic.

The habit that earns the points. Unit discipline. acre-in/hr ≈ cfs makes the rational formula work in US units. Every relation below is dimensionally consistent only when that rule is honoured, and the distractor set is deliberately built from candidates who ignored it. Write the unit next to every number you substitute, every time.

How to study this page. Read the theory, then cover the formula cards and try to reproduce each relation from its description. Then work the examples with the solution hidden, revealing one line at a time. Finish with the self-check questions; if you cannot answer one, return to the matching formula card.

Row of centrifugal pumps and valved steel piping inside a water pumping station.

Photo 1. Where this shows up in practice: lake classification.

Capstone Studio instructional photograph

houtlet

Hydrology and Water Resources — Lake Classification: reference schematic for orienting the symbols used in this section.

Theory, developed

Read this before the equations — it is what makes them memorable.

The physical situation

Every item from this section describes a watershed, aquifer or detention facility. Sketch it before you compute — a labelled sketch with the givens on it converts a wordy stem into a solvable problem and exposes the quantity the examiner left out on purpose.

The governing principle

The 0 relations on this page are consequences of one principle applied to that idealised system. Identify which quantity is conserved, balanced, or defined, and the correct equation follows without memorisation.

Assumptions and limits of validity

Each printed relation carries silent assumptions — linearity, steady state, uniformity, small deformation, or standard conditions, depending on the subject. Conceptual exam items are written by violating exactly one of these, so read the sentence above the equation as carefully as the equation itself.

Solution procedure you should automate

1) Read the last sentence of the stem to identify the requested quantity. 2) Locate the relation on this page whose left-hand side is that quantity. 3) Tabulate the givens with units and mark the missing symbol. 4) If a symbol is missing, find the one relation that produces it. 5) Rearrange symbolically, substitute once, evaluate, and round only at the end.

Row of centrifugal pumps and valved steel piping inside a water pumping station.

Photo 2. Hydrology and Water Resources: the physical system the theory above idealises.

Capstone Studio instructional photograph

Handbook notes for this section

Definitions and conditions exactly as the handbook states them.

  • Lake Classification Based on Productivity
  • Chlorophyll a Secchi Depth Total Phosphorus
  • Lake Classification
  • Concentration (µg/L) (m) Concentration (µg/L)
  • Oligotrophic Average 1.7 9.9 8
  • Range 0.3–4.5 5.4–28.3 3.0–17.7
  • Mesotrophic Average 4.7 4.2 26.7
  • Range 3–11 1.5–8.1 10.9–95.6
  • Eutrophic Average 14.3 2.5 84.4
  • Range 3–78 0.0–7.0 15–386
  • Source: Wetzel, 1983
  • Davis, MacKenzie and David Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, 4th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008, p. 394.

Core formulas for this FE topic

Definitions, applicability, units, assumptions and worked examples for each relation.

This section is conceptual; there are no equations to memorise.

Worked exam-style examples

The four ways this section is written on the real exam — thoughts first, then equations, then substitution.

Example 1
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 16 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 3.5 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 7.7 m. Its volume is 15.5 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 10.5 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 16 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 3.5 µg/L
  • Secchi = 7.7 m
  • V = 15.5 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 10.5 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 3.5 µg/L and Secchi 7.7 m are consistent with a clear, low-productivity system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 44, the lake is mesotrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 21.5 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Example 2
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification (2)

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 24 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 37.5 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 0.7 m. Its volume is 30.0 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 8.5 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 24 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 37.5 µg/L
  • Secchi = 0.7 m
  • V = 30.0 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 8.5 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 37.5 µg/L and Secchi 0.7 m are consistent with a productive system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 50, the lake is mesotrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 24.1 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Example 3
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification (3)

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 72 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 21.0 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 5.3 m. Its volume is 11.0 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 7.5 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 72 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 21.0 µg/L
  • Secchi = 5.3 m
  • V = 11.0 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 7.5 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 21.0 µg/L and Secchi 5.3 m are consistent with a productive system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 66, the lake is eutrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 30.9 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Example 4
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification (4)

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 15 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 13.5 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 4.8 m. Its volume is 9.5 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 4.0 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 15 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 13.5 µg/L
  • Secchi = 4.8 m
  • V = 9.5 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 4.0 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 13.5 µg/L and Secchi 4.8 m are consistent with a productive system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 43, the lake is mesotrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 21.1 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Example 5
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification (5)

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 78 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 35.0 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 6.2 m. Its volume is 16.5 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 6.0 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 78 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 35.0 µg/L
  • Secchi = 6.2 m
  • V = 16.5 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 6.0 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 35.0 µg/L and Secchi 6.2 m are consistent with a productive system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 67, the lake is eutrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 31.4 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Example 6
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification (6)

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 71 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 27.0 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 2.3 m. Its volume is 10.5 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 3.0 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 71 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 27.0 µg/L
  • Secchi = 2.3 m
  • V = 10.5 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 3.0 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 27.0 µg/L and Secchi 2.3 m are consistent with a productive system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 66, the lake is eutrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 30.8 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Example 7
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification (7)

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 13 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 40.0 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 2.8 m. Its volume is 18.0 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 10.0 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 13 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 40.0 µg/L
  • Secchi = 2.8 m
  • V = 18.0 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 10.0 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 40.0 µg/L and Secchi 2.8 m are consistent with a productive system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 41, the lake is mesotrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 20.2 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Example 8
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification (8)

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 35 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 41.0 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 4.4 m. Its volume is 14.0 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 8.5 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 35 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 41.0 µg/L
  • Secchi = 4.4 m
  • V = 14.0 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 8.5 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 41.0 µg/L and Secchi 4.4 m are consistent with a productive system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 55, the lake is eutrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 26.4 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Example 9
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification (9)

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 16 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 40.0 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 6.7 m. Its volume is 21.0 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 10.5 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 16 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 40.0 µg/L
  • Secchi = 6.7 m
  • V = 21.0 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 10.5 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 40.0 µg/L and Secchi 6.7 m are consistent with a productive system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 44, the lake is mesotrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 21.5 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Example 10
Lake trophic classification from phosphorus, chlorophyll and Secchi depth — Lake Classification (10)

A reservoir has a growing-season total phosphorus of 30 µg/L, chlorophyll-a of 34.5 µg/L and a Secchi depth of 7.7 m. Its volume is 15.0 × 10⁶ m³ with an inflow of 1.0 m³/s. Compute the Carlson trophic state index from phosphorus, classify the lake, and find the hydraulic residence time.

Given

  • TP = 30 µg/L
  • Chl-a = 34.5 µg/L
  • Secchi = 7.7 m
  • V = 15.0 × 10⁶ m³, Q = 1.0 m³/s

Find

TSI(TP), the trophic class and the residence time

Start with the thinking

  • Phosphorus is normally the limiting nutrient in fresh water, so it drives classification.
  • Residence time controls how long nutrients stay available for algal growth.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

  2. Substituting

  3. Classification

  4. Formula

  5. Substituting

  6. Cross-check — chlorophyll-a of 34.5 µg/L and Secchi 7.7 m are consistent with a productive system.

Answer: TSI ≈ 53, the lake is eutrophic, τ ≈ 0.0 days

Why the other options are there

  • 25.5 (log base 10 instead of natural log)
  • τ = 0.0 days (seconds-to-days conversion applied twice)

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Hydrology and Water Resources → Lake Classification

Self-check

Answer these without notes before moving on.

  1. Without looking, state the relation on this page whose left-hand side is the quantity most often requested, and name every symbol in it.
  2. Which assumption, if violated, makes the main relation of this section invalid?
  3. Given a watershed, aquifer or detention facility, what is the first quantity you would compute, and why that one first?
  4. Which unit conversion in this subject most often produces a wrong answer choice, and what is its numerical factor?
  5. Rework Example 1 above from the givens alone, without reading the solution lines.

Chapter summary

  • Lake Classification contains 0 relations; you must be able to find this page in under 15 seconds.
  • Exam style: a rainfall-runoff or well-drawdown calculation with one lookup.
  • Unit rule: acre-in/hr ≈ cfs makes the rational formula work in US units.
  • Work the 10 examples until the solution path, not the answer, is automatic.

Common traps in this section

  • acre-in/hr ≈ cfs makes the rational formula work in US units
  • Answering the intermediate quantity instead of the quantity requested.
  • Rounding intermediate values before the final step.
  • Using a relation from an adjacent handbook section that shares a symbol.
  • Skipping the sketch — most lost points on this page start with a misread geometry.
© 2026 Civil Engineering Capstone Studio. All rights reserved.