Skip to content

Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Environmental Engineering · FE Reference Handbook section

Environmental Engineering
0 formulas
10 exam-style examples
~45 min
All Environmental Engineering lectures

Handbook notes for this section

Definitions and conditions exactly as the handbook states them.

  • BIOMASS PHOTOSYNTHESIS SUN PHOTO-
  • FOSSIL FUELS NUCLEAR GEOTHERMAL TO END USES:

Core formulas for this FE topic

Definitions, applicability, units, assumptions and worked examples for each relation.

This section is conceptual; there are no equations to memorise.

Worked exam-style examples

The four ways this section is written on the real exam — thoughts first, then equations, then substitution.

Example 1
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

A reactor of volume 1,966 m³ treats 0.80 m³/s carrying 101 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.30 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=1,966m3V = 1,966 m^{3}
  • Q=0.80m3/sQ = 0.80 m^{3}/s
  • C0=101mg/LC_{0} = 101 mg/L
  • k=0.30h−1k = 0.30 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=1966/0.80=2,458s=0.683h\tau = 1966/0.80 = 2,458 s = 0.683 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=101/(1+0.30×0.683)=83.83mg/LC = 101/(1 + 0.30 \times 0.683) = 83.83 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=101e(−0.30×0.683)=82.30mg/LC = 101 e^(-0.30 \times 0.683) = 82.30 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 18.5% versus 17.0% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=0.68h;CCSTR=83.8mg/L,CPFR=82.3mg/L\tau = 0.68 h; C_CSTR = 83.8 mg/L, C_PFR = 82.3 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 80.3 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 83.8 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Example 2
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes (2)

A reactor of volume 4,642 m³ treats 1.20 m³/s carrying 350 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.30 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=4,642m3V = 4,642 m^{3}
  • Q=1.20m3/sQ = 1.20 m^{3}/s
  • C0=350mg/LC_{0} = 350 mg/L
  • k=0.30h−1k = 0.30 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=4642/1.20=3,868s=1.075h\tau = 4642/1.20 = 3,868 s = 1.075 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=350/(1+0.30×1.075)=264.7mg/LC = 350/(1 + 0.30 \times 1.075) = 264.7 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=350e(−0.30×1.075)=253.6mg/LC = 350 e^(-0.30 \times 1.075) = 253.6 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 27.6% versus 24.4% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=1.07h;CCSTR=264.7mg/L,CPFR=253.6mg/L\tau = 1.07 h; C_CSTR = 264.7 mg/L, C_PFR = 253.6 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 237.2 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 264.7 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Example 3
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes (3)

A reactor of volume 3,931 m³ treats 1.85 m³/s carrying 213 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.40 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=3,931m3V = 3,931 m^{3}
  • Q=1.85m3/sQ = 1.85 m^{3}/s
  • C0=213mg/LC_{0} = 213 mg/L
  • k=0.40h−1k = 0.40 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=3931/1.85=2,125s=0.590h\tau = 3931/1.85 = 2,125 s = 0.590 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=213/(1+0.40×0.590)=172.3mg/LC = 213/(1 + 0.40 \times 0.590) = 172.3 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=213e(−0.40×0.590)=168.2mg/LC = 213 e^(-0.40 \times 0.590) = 168.2 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 21.0% versus 19.1% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=0.59h;CCSTR=172.3mg/L,CPFR=168.2mg/L\tau = 0.59 h; C_CSTR = 172.3 mg/L, C_PFR = 168.2 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 162.7 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 172.3 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Example 4
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes (4)

A reactor of volume 4,830 m³ treats 1.85 m³/s carrying 322 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.50 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=4,830m3V = 4,830 m^{3}
  • Q=1.85m3/sQ = 1.85 m^{3}/s
  • C0=322mg/LC_{0} = 322 mg/L
  • k=0.50h−1k = 0.50 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=4830/1.85=2,611s=0.725h\tau = 4830/1.85 = 2,611 s = 0.725 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=322/(1+0.50×0.725)=236.3mg/LC = 322/(1 + 0.50 \times 0.725) = 236.3 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=322e(−0.50×0.725)=224.1mg/LC = 322 e^(-0.50 \times 0.725) = 224.1 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 30.4% versus 26.6% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=0.73h;CCSTR=236.3mg/L,CPFR=224.1mg/L\tau = 0.73 h; C_CSTR = 236.3 mg/L, C_PFR = 224.1 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 205.2 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 236.3 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Example 5
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes (5)

A reactor of volume 4,326 m³ treats 1.75 m³/s carrying 173 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.40 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=4,326m3V = 4,326 m^{3}
  • Q=1.75m3/sQ = 1.75 m^{3}/s
  • C0=173mg/LC_{0} = 173 mg/L
  • k=0.40h−1k = 0.40 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=4326/1.75=2,472s=0.687h\tau = 4326/1.75 = 2,472 s = 0.687 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=173/(1+0.40×0.687)=135.7mg/LC = 173/(1 + 0.40 \times 0.687) = 135.7 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=173e(−0.40×0.687)=131.4mg/LC = 173 e^(-0.40 \times 0.687) = 131.4 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 24.0% versus 21.5% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=0.69h;CCSTR=135.7mg/L,CPFR=131.4mg/L\tau = 0.69 h; C_CSTR = 135.7 mg/L, C_PFR = 131.4 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 125.5 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 135.7 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Example 6
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes (6)

A reactor of volume 2,804 m³ treats 0.45 m³/s carrying 318 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.10 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=2,804m3V = 2,804 m^{3}
  • Q=0.45m3/sQ = 0.45 m^{3}/s
  • C0=318mg/LC_{0} = 318 mg/L
  • k=0.10h−1k = 0.10 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=2804/0.45=6,231s=1.731h\tau = 2804/0.45 = 6,231 s = 1.731 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=318/(1+0.10×1.731)=271.1mg/LC = 318/(1 + 0.10 \times 1.731) = 271.1 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=318e(−0.10×1.731)=267.5mg/LC = 318 e^(-0.10 \times 1.731) = 267.5 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 15.9% versus 14.8% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=1.73h;CCSTR=271.1mg/L,CPFR=267.5mg/L\tau = 1.73 h; C_CSTR = 271.1 mg/L, C_PFR = 267.5 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 263.0 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 271.1 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Example 7
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes (7)

A reactor of volume 3,256 m³ treats 2.00 m³/s carrying 179 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.10 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=3,256m3V = 3,256 m^{3}
  • Q=2.00m3/sQ = 2.00 m^{3}/s
  • C0=179mg/LC_{0} = 179 mg/L
  • k=0.10h−1k = 0.10 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=3256/2.00=1,628s=0.452h\tau = 3256/2.00 = 1,628 s = 0.452 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=179/(1+0.10×0.452)=171.3mg/LC = 179/(1 + 0.10 \times 0.452) = 171.3 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=179e(−0.10×0.452)=171.1mg/LC = 179 e^(-0.10 \times 0.452) = 171.1 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 4.4% versus 4.3% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=0.45h;CCSTR=171.3mg/L,CPFR=171.1mg/L\tau = 0.45 h; C_CSTR = 171.3 mg/L, C_PFR = 171.1 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 170.9 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 171.3 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Example 8
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes (8)

A reactor of volume 1,513 m³ treats 0.65 m³/s carrying 370 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.25 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=1,513m3V = 1,513 m^{3}
  • Q=0.65m3/sQ = 0.65 m^{3}/s
  • C0=370mg/LC_{0} = 370 mg/L
  • k=0.25h−1k = 0.25 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=1513/0.65=2,328s=0.647h\tau = 1513/0.65 = 2,328 s = 0.647 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=370/(1+0.25×0.647)=318.5mg/LC = 370/(1 + 0.25 \times 0.647) = 318.5 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=370e(−0.25×0.647)=314.8mg/LC = 370 e^(-0.25 \times 0.647) = 314.8 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 14.9% versus 13.9% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=0.65h;CCSTR=318.5mg/L,CPFR=314.8mg/L\tau = 0.65 h; C_CSTR = 318.5 mg/L, C_PFR = 314.8 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 310.2 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 318.5 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Example 9
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes (9)

A reactor of volume 3,460 m³ treats 1.90 m³/s carrying 324 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.50 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=3,460m3V = 3,460 m^{3}
  • Q=1.90m3/sQ = 1.90 m^{3}/s
  • C0=324mg/LC_{0} = 324 mg/L
  • k=0.50h−1k = 0.50 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=3460/1.90=1,821s=0.506h\tau = 3460/1.90 = 1,821 s = 0.506 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=324/(1+0.50×0.506)=258.6mg/LC = 324/(1 + 0.50 \times 0.506) = 258.6 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=324e(−0.50×0.506)=251.6mg/LC = 324 e^(-0.50 \times 0.506) = 251.6 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 22.3% versus 20.2% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=0.51h;CCSTR=258.6mg/L,CPFR=251.6mg/L\tau = 0.51 h; C_CSTR = 258.6 mg/L, C_PFR = 251.6 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 242.1 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 258.6 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

Example 10
First-order removal in a CSTR versus a plug-flow reactor — Energy Sources and Conversion Processes (10)

A reactor of volume 3,559 m³ treats 1.30 m³/s carrying 100 mg/L of a contaminant that decays first-order with k = 0.25 h⁻¹. Compute the hydraulic residence time and the effluent concentration if the tank behaves as a CSTR and as a plug-flow reactor.

Given

  • V=3,559m3V = 3,559 m^{3}
  • Q=1.30m3/sQ = 1.30 m^{3}/s
  • C0=100mg/LC_{0} = 100 mg/L
  • k=0.25h−1k = 0.25 h^{-1}

Find

τ, CSTR effluent and PFR effluent

Start with the thinking

  • The mass balance for steady state is: in − out − reaction = 0.
  • For the same volume, plug flow always outperforms a single completely mixed tank for first-order kinetics.

Step-by-step solution

  1. Formula

    τ=V/Q\tau = V/Q
  2. Substituting

    τ=3559/1.30=2,738s=0.760h\tau = 3559/1.30 = 2,738 s = 0.760 h
  3. Formula (CSTR)

    C=C0/(1+kτ)C = C_{0}/(1 + k \tau)
  4. Substituting

    C=100/(1+0.25×0.760)=84.03mg/LC = 100/(1 + 0.25 \times 0.760) = 84.03 mg/L
  5. Formula (PFR)

    C=C0e(−kτ)C = C_{0} e^(-k \tau)
  6. Substituting

    C=100e(−0.25×0.760)=82.69mg/LC = 100 e^(-0.25 \times 0.760) = 82.69 mg/L
  7. Comparison — plug flow removes 17.3% versus 16.0% for the CSTR

Answer:
τ=0.76h;CCSTR=84.0mg/L,CPFR=82.7mg/L\tau = 0.76 h; C_CSTR = 84.0 mg/L, C_PFR = 82.7 mg/L

Why the other options are there

  • 81.0 mg/L (linear decay assumed)
  • 84.0 mg/L for both reactors

Reference: FE Reference Handbook — Environmental Engineering → Energy Sources and Conversion Processes

© 2026 Dr. Steve Efe. Civil Engineering Capstone Studio. All rights reserved.