Skip to content
Three engineers in hard hats and safety vests reviewing drawings on a truck tailgate.

Rubrics

Field review: the conversation in which a scope, a constraint or a decision is actually settled.

CEGR 492
Proposal Development
Fall 2026
Section 001
student

CEGR 492 · Rubrics

Scoring criteria used for every graded item in this course.

Communication rubric

Applies to: Chapters and presentations

  • Structure — Academic structure and logical flow
    30 pts
  • Evidence — Claims supported and cited
    35 pts
  • Style — Formal, concise engineering writing
    35 pts

Completeness rubric

Applies to: Proposal deliverables

  • Required content — Every required section is present
    40 pts
  • Sources — Adequate number and quality of sources
    30 pts
  • Formatting — Meets the required academic format
    30 pts

Technical correctness rubric

Applies to: Analysis and design procedure

  • Method choice — Methods suit the stated problem
    40 pts
  • Rigor — Procedure is defensible and repeatable
    35 pts
  • Feasibility — Achievable within Capstone II
    25 pts

Project management rubric

Applies to: Planning deliverables

  • Plan quality — Tasks, owners and dates are clear
    40 pts
  • Risk — Risks and contingencies identified
    30 pts
  • Realism — Plan is achievable in the semester
    30 pts

Schedule rubric

Applies to: Execution schedule

  • Activities — Complete activity list with durations
    35 pts
  • Logic — Dependencies and critical path defined
    40 pts
  • Realism — Assumptions defensible
    25 pts
© 2026 Dr. Steve Efe. Civil Engineering Capstone Studio. All rights reserved.